Commune

Where
newsletters
get discovered.

Find your next favorite read and join the conversation under every article. For writers, it's where new readers find you, your audience grows, and every article sparks a discussion.

Featured

An editor's pick worth your time

You all told me I was wrong. You were right
The Weekly ShiftThe Weekly Shift

You all told me I was wrong. You were right

I asked about open source. The answers blew my mind

In the discussion

Jack Lhasa Think you’ve got it right. The last year on SubStack has seen. The addition is 3 features no one asked for, and did nothing but alienate the writers there. Writers who didn’t have a need for short videos, or podcasts, or AI detector that is another AI and lie about its own accuracy. Pangram claims a 90+% accuracy. I ran experiments including over 30 articles ran through Pangram. Not one was correctly identified. Not one in 30. Most weren’t difficult, like an article I wrote that was flagged as 100% AI, and one that was fully generated with no changes from me that it ID’d at 100% human. As I went in u mixed AI into writing in different ways, but Pangram never recognized the mixes. What each of these new features had was a negative effect on the community. Video and podcast formulas were obviously pandering in to a completely different kind of user. The Pangram integration caused 6 months of arguments as to the ethical implications it brought along with several new authors that were being courted by the largest publishers, suddenly developed rumors of possible AI content. Two lost multimillion dollar publishing deals. Just because of of rumors, these brand new authors had careers destroyed forever and lost lucrative contracts with major publishers. Pangram brought with it only suspicion. It didn’t decrease slop(which I’m almost certain has nothing to do with AI, and is actually the result of normal living people who are just bad writers). By embracing an AI judgement machine that could only be used by authors and readers, and no result that would actually punish the users in anyway, absolutely destroyed the community. It caused months of frustration from authors, and created a space where any article about AI becoming the norm.

Join the discussion4 replies
94

Jump into the discussion

Threads people are talking in right now

  • The Weekly Interface

    Do you still need an SDK generator?

    The Weekly Interface

    2 repliesactive 1d ago
    Samir Amzani@samz· 1d

    Thank you, Kin. Agreed, the speed of the shift surprised me too. Twenty months ago we were comparing SDK generators on features, and now the question is which ones will still exist 😅

  • The Weekly Shift

    You all told me I was wrong. You were right

    The Weekly Shift

    4 repliesactive 5d ago
    Jack Lhasa@moonshadow· 5d

    Think you’ve got it right. The last year on SubStack has seen. The addition is 3 features no one asked for, and did nothing but alienate the writers there. Writers who didn’t have a need for short videos, or podcasts, or AI detector that is another AI and lie about its own accuracy. Pangram claims a 90+% accuracy. I ran experiments including over 30 articles ran through Pangram. Not one was correctly identified. Not one in 30. Most weren’t difficult, like an article I wrote that was flagged as 100% AI, and one that was fully generated with no changes from me that it ID’d at 100% human. As I went in u mixed AI into writing in different ways, but Pangram never recognized the mixes. What each of these new features had was a negative effect on the community. Video and podcast formulas were obviously pandering in to a completely different kind of user. The Pangram integration caused 6 months of arguments as to the ethical implications it brought along with several new authors that were being courted by the largest publishers, suddenly developed rumors of possible AI content. Two lost multimillion dollar publishing deals. Just because of of rumors, these brand new authors had careers destroyed forever and lost lucrative contracts with major publishers. Pangram brought with it only suspicion. It didn’t decrease slop(which I’m almost certain has nothing to do with AI, and is actually the result of normal living people who are just bad writers). By embracing an AI judgement machine that could only be used by authors and readers, and no result that would actually punish the users in anyway, absolutely destroyed the community. It caused months of frustration from authors, and created a space where any article about AI becoming the norm.

  • Event-Driven Architecture Notes by Iván García

    Domain Modeling with ZDL: Aggregates, Commands, Events, and State Machines

    Event-Driven Architecture Notes by Iván García

    1 replyactive 1w ago
    Jack Lhasa@moonshadow· 1w

    I wish I understood more of this. A lot of it sounds like it would make my notes and world building easier

  • The Weekly Interface

    Linters are where API governance becomes real

    The Weekly Interface

    2 repliesactive 1w ago
    Samir Amzani@samz· 1w

    Thanks Kin, and thanks for putting real numbers on what many of us only suspected, looking forward to OpenLint bright future

  • Pup On Tech

    Life Update 8/5/26

    Pup On Tech

    2 repliesactive 1w ago
    Avrohom Gross@pupontech· 1w

    @joycestack yep its a pretty fun initiatiave though I havent broken 50 yet lol

Newsletter of the week

One publication we think you'll love

manager.dev

manager.dev

managerdev

Rising newsletters

Growing fast this week

MoonShadow

MoonShadow

175 this week
The Hope Collective

The Hope Collective

14 this week
APIs.io

APIs.io

125 this week
API Evangelist

API Evangelist

125 this week
The Coffeehouse Creative

The Coffeehouse Creative

10 this week
manager.dev

manager.dev

525 this week

Editor's picks

Handpicked reads from across the network

Hidden gems

Underrated reads you may have missed

Your newsletter, discovered.

Get in front of new readers, and give every article a conversation. Free to connect.

  • Reach new readers
  • A community under every article
  • Free to connect

Get your newsletter discovered

Connect your newsletter to get in front of new readers here, grow your subscribers, and spark conversation around every article.

Sign up to connect your newsletter
DiscordBuilt in the open

Commune is an open network. Join our Discord for support, to shape the roadmap, reach the founder, and try new features early.

DiscordJoin our Discord